Registered Charity No. 1088008.

 

 
Chairman's Report
 
 

 

Conference 2007

back to Programme

ANDROGENS AND PROSTATE CANCER: NOTHING TO FEAR BUT THE FEAR ITSELF

Prof. Alvaro Morales

Centre for Advanced Urological Research, Queen's University, 62 Barrie St., Kingston, Ontario, Canada K7L 3J7. moralesa@post.queensu.ca

The effect of testosterone (T) on the development of the prostate gland is well documented. The involution of prostate cancer (PCa) following suppression of circulating androgens is also well known. Unfortunately, a widespread belief that T produces PCa has existed for a long time. There is no compelling evidence for such a causal relationship. On the contrary, early evidence suggests that it is the T deficiency status that might facilitate prostate carcinogenesis. The verification for either view, however, is lacking.
The process of prostate carcinogenesis is not fully understood although great strides have been made in the last decade. There is overwhelming evidence that factors influencing the development and growth of PCa are much more than simply an excess or shortage of circulating sex steroids: non-steroidal hormones (insulin, glucocorticoids, leptin, growth hormone), genetic susceptibility, sexually transmitted agents, diet, and environmental carcinogenesis appear to be significant contributors to the process. There is, in addition, a growing body of literature presenting the puzzling paradox that T and other androgens are essential for the gland's development, while they may also prevent and inhibit the establishment of PCa. There is solid information indicating that novel signaling pathways, with or without participation of the androgen-receptor signaling cascade can be activated independently of serum androgen levels. Finally, intriguing preliminary studies have shown that the hormonal ecology of the prostate might be independent of the androgen levels in peripheral blood.
It is widely accepted that the administration of T to a man with known or suspected PCa is contraindicated. On the other hand, it should not escape anyone the irony and inconsistency in therapeutic criteria when men with metastatic PCa are treated with intermittent androgen suppression, essentially allowing the restoration of T production. Furthermore, castration (chemical or surgical) generally does not constitute part of the curative treatment offered to men with localized PCA.
Experience has shown that a pre-existing PCa might be stimulated by T and that a T deficiency state may mask the presence of such a tumor. For this reason, extreme caution should be exercised in regards to prostate safety when T therapy is contemplated. Potential adverse effects related to prostate safety can, thus be detected early, corrective action taken promptly and serious sequelae avoided.