Registered Charity No. 1088008.

 

 
Chairman's Report
 
 

 

Conference 2005

back to Programme

AndroFront.jpg (9764 bytes)

INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCES WITH THE AGING MALES SYMPTOMS SCALE

Heinemann, L.A.J.

Center for Epidemiology and Health Research Berlin, Invalidenstr. 115, 10115 Berlin, Germany. heinemann@zeg-berlin.de

The scale was designed and standardized as a self-administered scale to (a) to assess symptoms of aging (independent from those which are disease-related) between groups of males under different conditions, (b) to evaluate the severity of symptoms over time, and (c) to measure changes pre- and post androgen replacement therapy. The AMS scale is short and easy to apply, has a very simple evaluation scheme, and was internationally well accepted (translated into 17 languages). Methodological test characteristics: Reliability measures (internal consistency and test-retest stability) were found to be good across countries. Validity: The internal structure of the AMS in healthy and androgen deficient males, and across countries was sufficiently similar to conclude that the scale really measures the same phenomenon in different cultures. French experiences even show that the scale similarly measures in younger age groups below 40 years. This is important for investigations in young hypogonadal men. In addition, population reference values for AMS results seem to be pretty similar across countries. The comparison of the AMS with the two established screening instruments for androgen deficiency (ADAM scale of Morley et al and the screener of Smith et al.) showed sufficiently good compatibility despite conceptual differences with AMS. Thus, the AMS scale obviously measures similar phenomena with a similar quality, although it was not developed as a screening instrument. Clinicians often consider validity as utility for outcome measurement. The AMS scale showed a convincing ability to measure treatment effects on quality of life across the full range of severity of complaints before therapy. The distribution of complaints of testosterone deficient men before therapy almost returned to normal values after 12 weeks of testosterone treatment. The AMS scale was not developed or standardized as screening instrument for androgen deficiency, and the association of the AMS scale per se with testosterone level is controversial in the literature. Research in Austria (Kratzik et al) however indicated the possibility that the combination of AMS results with BMI and age might predict the presence of androgen deficiency in aging males. A screening tool consisting of the above mentioned three parameters was developed and preliminarily tested together with Kratzik. The test characteristics (sensitivity and specificity) are promising and will be presented. Further research and experience in practice is needed before this screening scheme can finally be recommended for important screening activities.

For more details see: www.aging-males-symptoms-scale.info.